- Published on
Beyond Text Generation: How Agentic AI Systems Differ from Simple LLMs
- Authors
- Name
- Abdul Rauf
- @armujahid

Introduction
When most people think of AI language models, they picture a chatbot that answers questions with text. But that's just the beginning. Modern agentic systems—like Claude with computer use capabilities—can actually execute code, use tools, and interact with files and APIs.
This post explores the key differences between simple LLMs and agentic systems, and why it matters for practical applications.
What Is a Simple LLM Model?
A simple LLM is essentially a text-in, text-out system. It predicts the next token based on patterns learned from training data. While impressive at language tasks, it operates within strict boundaries.
Characteristics of Simple LLMs
Pure Text Processing
- Input: Text prompt from the user
- Output: Generated text response
- No ability to take actions beyond text generation
Stateless Operation
- Each interaction is independent
- No persistent memory between conversations (unless explicitly provided in context)
- Cannot remember previous sessions
No External Interactions
- Cannot access the internet or databases
- Cannot run code or perform calculations (beyond what's "memorized" in training)
- Cannot interact with files, APIs, or other systems
Limited Verification
- Cannot verify its outputs
- May confidently state incorrect information (hallucinations)
- Cannot perform real-time fact-checking
Example: Simple LLM Interaction
# Simple LLM interaction
user_prompt = "What's 15,728 × 9,342?"
llm_response = "Approximately 146,888,976"
# Note: The LLM can't actually calculate this precisely
# It's making an educated guess based on training data
Simple LLMs work well for conversation, content creation, and text analysis, but can't interact with the world beyond their training data.
NOTE
Even GPT-4 or Claude operate as "simple LLMs" when used through basic API calls without tool access.
Enter Agentic Systems: AI That Can Act
Agentic systems combine language understanding with the ability to use tools, execute code, and interact with execution environments. Instead of just talking about solutions, they can actually implement them.
Key Components of Agentic Systems
Execution Environment
- Write and execute code in multiple languages
- Install packages and libraries
- Read and write files
- Process data in real-time
Tool Use
- Web search for current information
- Database queries
- File manipulation (read, write, edit)
- API calls to external services
Skills and Workflows
- Document creation (DOCX, PDF, PPTX, XLSX)
- Data analysis and visualization
- Code generation and debugging
- Multi-step reasoning
Feedback Loops Unlike simple LLMs, agents can execute code, see the results, and iterate when things don't work.
The Fundamental Differences
1. Calculation and Computation
Simple LLM:
User: "Calculate the compound interest on $10,000 at 5% for 10 years"
LLM: "The approximate result would be around $16,288..."
# May be incorrect, can't verify
Agentic System:
User: "Calculate the compound interest on $10,000 at 5% for 10 years"
# Agent writes and executes actual code:
principal = 10000
rate = 0.05
time = 10
amount = principal * (1 + rate) ** time
print(f"Final amount: ${amount:.2f}")
print(f"Interest earned: ${amount - principal:.2f}")
# Output:
# Final amount: $16288.95
# Interest earned: $6288.95
The agentic system writes code, executes it, and provides verified results.
2. File and Document Processing
Simple LLM: Limited to analyzing text that's pasted into the conversation. Cannot directly read files or create downloadable documents.
Agentic System: Can read uploaded files, process them programmatically, and create new documents:
# Agent can:
# 1. Read an uploaded spreadsheet
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_excel('/path/to/sales_data.xlsx')
# 2. Analyze the data
monthly_revenue = df.groupby('month')['revenue'].sum()
growth_rate = monthly_revenue.pct_change() * 100
# 3. Create a presentation with the results
from pptx import Presentation
prs = Presentation()
# ... add slides with charts and analysis
# 4. Provide a downloadable file
prs.save('/output/sales_analysis.pptx')
3. Real-Time Information Access
Simple LLM: Limited to training data cutoff.
Agentic System: Can search the web and fetch current information.
4. Iterative Problem Solving
Simple LLM: Provides one response. If wrong, needs user intervention.
Agentic System: Can see errors and fix them automatically through iteration.
IMPORTANT
Self-correction is what makes agentic systems reliable for complex tasks. They catch and fix their own mistakes.
Real-World Use Cases
Data Analysis
Simple LLM: "Based on what you described, there's probably a correlation between X and Y."
Agentic System: Reads the data file, runs statistical analysis with pandas, generates visualizations, and provides specific verified insights.
Document Creation
Simple LLM: Provides markdown text you need to copy and format.
Agentic System: Creates actual DOCX/PPTX/XLSX files with professional formatting, ready to download.
Software Development
Simple LLM: Writes code snippets you need to copy and test.
Agentic System: Writes complete code in files, executes and tests it, debugs errors, installs dependencies, and provides ready-to-run applications.
The Architecture Behind Agentic Systems
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ User Request │
└──────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐
│ Language Model (Planning & Reasoning) │
│ • Understands request │
│ • Plans approach │
│ • Decides which tools to use │
└──────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────┼──────────┬──────────┬─────────┐
│ │ │ │ │
┌───▼────┐ ┌──▼────┐ ┌──▼──────┐ ┌─▼──────┐ ┌▼────────────┐
│ Code │ │ Web │ │ File │ │ Skills │ │ MCP │
│ Exec │ │Search │ │ System │ │Library │ │Servers/Tools│
└───┬────┘ └───┬───┘ └────┬────┘ └───┬────┘ └──┬──────────┘
│ │ │ │ │
└──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴─────────┘
│
┌──────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐
│ Execution Environment │
│ • Sandboxed Linux container │
│ • Python, Node.js, system tools │
│ • File system access │
│ • Network access (controlled) │
│ • External data sources via MCP │
└──────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐
│ Results & Artifacts │
│ • Verified outputs │
│ • Created files │
│ • Processed data │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The Reasoning Loop
Agentic systems operate in a continuous loop:
- Understand the request
- Plan the approach
- Execute using tools and code
- Observe results and errors
- Reflect on whether the goal is met
- Iterate until complete
This loop enables problem-solving that simple LLMs can't achieve.
Skills and Integrations
Modern agentic systems extend their capabilities through skills and integration protocols.
Skills: Pre-Packaged Expertise
Skills are specialized workflows that package domain expertise into reusable modules:
- Document Skills: DOCX, PPTX, PDF, XLSX creation with professional formatting
- Analysis Skills: Statistical analysis and visualization workflows
- Integration Skills: API connections and data extraction
When using a skill, the agent applies accumulated best practices rather than figuring things out from scratch. This makes outputs more professional and consistent.
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
MCP is an open standard for connecting AI systems to external data sources and tools. It enables:
- Standardized integration with databases, CRMs, and internal tools
- Bidirectional communication for reading and writing data
- Custom extensions for organization-specific needs
- Security controls with authentication and permissions
# Example: MCP server exposing a sales database
mcp_server.add_resource(
uri="database://sales",
handler=sales_database_handler
)
# Agent can then query naturally:
# "What were our Q3 sales?" → direct database query
MCP transforms isolated AI tools into integrated parts of your digital infrastructure.
Limitations and Considerations
Security: Execution environments must be sandboxed with controlled file/network access and malicious code detection.
Cost: More resource-intensive than simple LLMs. Each tool invocation adds latency and computational overhead.
Reliability: More potential failure points—code execution, tool responses, network requests.
Complexity: Requires infrastructure management, robust error handling, and security expertise.
Practical Implications
Use Simple LLMs for:
- Brainstorming and ideation
- Content writing and editing
- Explaining concepts
- Code review (without execution)
Use Agentic Systems for:
- Data analysis requiring calculations
- Document creation
- File processing
- Complex problem-solving with iteration
- Research needing current information
- Software development and testing
Real-World Example: Integrated Workflow
Combining execution environments, MCP, and skills enables complex workflows. For example, "Create a sales presentation using our Q3 data and industry benchmarks":
- MCP connects to your sales database and pulls Q3 numbers
- Web Search finds current industry benchmarks
- Skills apply professional presentation formatting
- Code Execution generates charts and calculates growth rates
- Output delivers a polished, accurate presentation
This integration wasn't possible with simple LLMs—it requires the full stack of modern agentic capabilities.
Conclusion
The shift from simple LLMs to agentic systems represents a fundamental change in AI capabilities. Simple LLMs excel at language tasks, while agentic systems can take action—executing code, creating documents, analyzing data, and solving problems through iteration.
Key Takeaways:
- Simple LLMs: Text-in, text-out systems limited to language tasks
- Agentic systems: Combine language understanding with tool use and code execution
- Execution environments: Enable verification, iteration, and real computation
- Skills: Package domain expertise for consistent, professional outputs
- MCP: Provides standardized integration with external systems
- Match the tool to the task: Simple questions don't need agents; complex workflows do
As these systems evolve, they'll become more sophisticated with better reasoning and self-correction. Standards like MCP show the industry moving toward deeply integrated, enterprise-ready AI systems that function more like colleagues than assistants.
Have you worked with agentic AI systems? What differences have you noticed compared to simple LLMs? Share your experiences in the comments below!